Cefense connects to a repository, scans what has been committed, reports the vulnerabilities it finds in the code, joins each one to the public security research that explains it, generates a patch, and opens a pull request.
The problem it solves
Most security tools are good at producing a list. They are not good at telling you which entries on that list are real, which of them an attacker can actually reach, and what to change. So the list grows, the team learns to ignore it, and the one finding that mattered is buried under four hundred that did not.
Cefense brings source findings, dependency advisories, credential patterns, and maintainability observations into one review queue. Read the evidence on each row: a reported pattern, a source-verified path, and an executed proof are different levels of evidence. Where patch generation is available, review the proposed change before publishing it.
How it works
Cefense uses a security model fine tuned for this task, driven by a proprietary pipeline built for efficient scans. The pipeline is what lets a full repository scan stay fast and cheap enough to run on every push rather than once a quarter.
What that means in practice: you connect a repository, a scan runs against a specific commit, and findings come back with severity, a confidence score, the code in question, the traced data flow, the research behind it, and remediation guidance. From there you can generate a patch and ship it.
What you get
- Findings with evidence appropriate to the check, including source locations, applicable dependency advisories, credential patterns, and code paths where recorded. A reported finding does not by itself establish runtime exploitability.
- The research behind them. A matched finding is joined to the public writing that explains the class of vulnerability, with the reasoning for the match.
- A patch you can read. The smallest change that closes the path, kept to the file the finding is in and the few it has to reach, generated against the exact commit that was scanned.
- A pull request on your terms. Nothing is opened or merged without an explicit action, and branch protection is respected rather than bypassed.
- The same product in three places. The workspace, the
cfcommand, and a machine interface a coding agent drives. None of them is a cut-down version of the others.
What Cefense is not
- It is not a runtime agent. Nothing is installed into your production workloads.
- It does not merge anything on its own. Publishing a pull request and merging one are separate, explicit actions.
- It does not silence findings for you. Suppressing something is your decision, recorded as yours.
Where to go next
Have a correction or need help?
Email the docs team